Why CPRE support the Advearse Campaign

Our countryside is being destroyed by the scale and type of building development that is taking place.

The government has set a target of building 300,000 houses per year.  The formula it devised to determine housing need across the country, however, has recently been found to include major errors in its statistical projections, which means the government’s figures for housing need are grossly inflated.  Housing need is now being estimated at nearly 50% below the government annual target.

Local authorities have no say in the number of houses they are required to plan to build.  They are bribed or penalised by central government over funding and meeting house-building targets; and they are also blackmailed by developers into granting planning consent to avoid the expense of government-policy-endorsed legal action against them if they try to refuse.  That’s why CPRE are calling the National Planning Policy Framework a speculative developers’ charter.

So rather than delivering what communities want, local government and local democracy effectively does not exist when it comes to planning permission in this country – this is why your voice and all your objections to Vearse Farm have been ignored by the council.

This situation is made worse here in West Dorset because the original, adopted Local Plan had a target of just under 16,000 houses based on the flawed national government formula, but the Local Plan Review has increased this figure to just over 19,000.  So if the government formula is wrong by 50%, then the number of houses planned for West Dorset is grossly excessive by a staggering 78%. 

Not only that, but the national targets are higher in areas such as Dorset where affordability is a problem, but the formula does not take into account the fact that the kind of growth it promotes may be applicable to urban areas and big cities, but is not appropriate for a small market town in a rural area, like Bridport.

Adding insult to injury, the West Dorset Local Plan Review admits that its house-building target is an oversupply that significantly exceeds what is purported to be the ‘objectively assessed need’ – while at the same time stating that ‘the total projected need for affordable housing is not expected to be met in the plan review period’.  This is because the houses planned to be built will in the main be luxury, unaffordable housing designed to make huge profits for developers but nothing to help local Dorset people. 

Now if you’re thinking this isn’t so bad because laws of supply and demand mean an oversupply of houses will bring prices down – think again.  The only people likely to be able to afford these houses are retirees from the big cities or second-home owners.  Such people are able and prepared to pay a premium for the houses, which will, in fact push prices up in the area.  So the 35% of so-called affordable houses pledged but not guaranteed to be built on developments like Vearse Farm, will be available for 80% of a cost vastly inflated by the model itself. 

So the entire planning policy is flawed, and biased completely towards profits for the developers while doing nothing to help house local people and families in need of low-cost and social housing.

West Dorset District Council has also failed to provide any kind of brownfield first policy.  In order to build on AONB land, the council and the developers have to prove that there are exceptional circumstances and that it is in the public interest for the AONB status – which should afford the highest possible protections – to be overruled.  The fact that this development will not help local people get the houses they need and can afford, shows that there are no exceptional circumstances to justify disregarding the law on this and concreting over our countryside.

Part of the reason the CPRE has granted ADVEARSE match-funding of up to £10,000 towards a judicial review against Vearse Farm is that it will be the biggest development ever to have been built on AONB land.  This is therefore a problem much bigger than Bridport alone, because if it is allowed to go ahead without challenge it will set a dangerous precedent allowing planning authorities to build anywhere on green belt and AONB land – and it will effectively destroy the protections of the AONB designation all over the country. 

Should ADVEARSE be successful, however, it will set a helpful legal precedent that can be applied across the whole of the planning process for West Dorset, regardless of existing Local Plan allocations, and one which will help to sustain and support AONB protections elsewhere in the country. 

Please give your support to this campaign, as CPRE has done.

ADVEARSE PUBLIC MEETING

Thanks to the 50 local residents who packed the WI Hall in Bridport last Thursday (24th April) to discuss the latest situation regarding the Vearse Farm urban extension. The public meeting was hosted by Advearse the campaign group.

The guest speaker was Mr Richard Nicholls, Deputy Chair of West Dorset CPRE, who set out the vital importance of opposing this massive and destructive development in order to protect AONB (Area of Outstanding Natural Beauty) land both in Bridport, but also across the whole of England.

With council plans to add another 170 houses to the Vearse Farm development it will, with 930 houses, be double the size of the previous largest build on AONB land. This would set a precedent that would make AONB land an easy target for developers.  

The audience were shocked to hear about the large number of brownfield sites available in Briport and the whole of Dorset that were being ignored by the local Council in favour of large scale green field developments fuelling easy profits for developers and house builders.

Sarah Carney made a strong plea for the young people of Bridport, in particular, who were being let down by this focus on satisfying developer greed and not housing need. The number of second homes in the Bridport area has been assessed as far higher than reported by the Council. These second homes remain empty for a large part of the year whilst young local people have no chance of affording even the Government’s “so called” affordable homes.

All of these failings result in the wrong houses being built in the wrong places for the wrong people.

Lewis Gerolemou detailed the many objections raised by local people including the massive increase in traffic congestion, lack of car parking, pressure on an already stretched medical centre and impact on wildlife and landscape.

Donations of over £500 resulted from the meeting in support of the Judicial Review challenge against the Vearse Farm urban extension. With CPRE support a total of £17,200 has been raised to date towards the £34,000 needed for the JR.

Barry Bates closed the meeting by calling upon all concerned people in Bridport and elsewhere to join us in our fight against a totally destructive, unnecessary and misguided development.

Fundraising Update – 25 April 2019

Thanks to the generosity of the people of Bridport the Judicial Review fundraising to challenge the Vearse Farm Outline Planning Permission reached £8,500. 136 people have donated with an average donation of over £60. We have had 32 donations of over £100 and 69 of over £50. Many local people have also promised to donate.

With the CPRE match funding support the total is doubled to £17,000! The CPRE matched funding is up to a maximum of £10,000 which means to reach the fundraising target of £34,000 we need to collect a further £15,500 in donations.

Once the Council issue the Decision notice we will only have 6 weeks to launch the Judicial Review. After that nothing can be done to prevent this massive urban extension from going ahead. So please donate and encourage your friends and neighbours to support the campaign.

Thank You!

Video of Vearse Farm

We have made a short video setting out the case against the against the unnecessary and massively destructive urbanisation of Bridport resulting from the Vearse Farm planning application.

Please share with friends and family so we can obtain the maximum support and donations to fund the Judicial Review against the planning application.

Save Bridport


Bridport News Article 14 March 2019

CAMPAIGNERS are set to challenge a decision to approve planning permission for more than 700 homes near Bridport.

Residents have donated more than £5,000 towards the cost of a judicial review into West Dorset District Council’s decision to grant outline planning permission for the Vearse Farm development.

This amount will be doubled thanks to a match-funding grant from the Campaign to Protect Rural England, Dorset.

Chairman of campaign group Advearse, Barry Bates, said: “We are overwhelmed and humbled by Bridport’s generosity. We’re frequently given cheques for £100 and more and most donations are over £50.”

Advearse says its lawyers believe the planning consent can be challenged because, they allege, it contravenes national rules about building on an Area of Outstanding Natural Beauty (AONB) and should be given ‘the highest possible protection’ from development.

A review will cost around £34,000 and, thanks to donations and match-funding, Advearse has £19,000 left to raise.

Mr Bates added: “The response to our leaflet drop has given us a renewed sense of responsibility. Bridport has shown that it is clearly united against this development which, despite its gross scale, will not deliver truly-affordable homes for local people and we will do our utmost to represent them.”

Advearse says it continues to receive a steady stream of donations and will launch an online appeal through the Bridport-based Crowdfunder website once a final decision notice has been issued by the council – but this will only give them a few weeks to make up any funding shortfall in order to make review application.

The group says it will continue to raise awareness of what it says are the ‘negative ramifications’ of the development and will hold a public meeting on Wednesday, April 24, at 7pm at the WI Hall on North Street, Bridport.

Members will update residents on the current situation concerning the application for the development. All are welcome to attend. For more information, contact advearse@aol.com.

The Bridport and Lyme Regis News has contacted West Dorset District Council to request a comment.

Stop press; Vearse Farm meeting

14th February 2019

We plan to hold a public meeting to update you on the latest developments on the Vearse Farm planning application on Wednesday 24th April at the WI Hall, North Street, Bridport,  DT6 3JH at 7.00. pm. Please check the local press, our Facebook page (https://www.facebook.com/ADVEARSE/), or follow us on Twitter (@advearse), for further details.

If you have any concerns at all about the implications for you and the local area then please read the leaflet and join our campaign.

ADVEARSE picket WDDC Local Plan review roadshow today (13-9-2018)

 

The handout available at today’s roadshow is as follows……

WHY DOES THE WDDC LOCAL PLAN REVIEW FAIL BRIDPORT?

  1. HOUSING PROVISION

The West Dorset District Council Local Plan Review (LPR) proposes to build an increased number of houses in West Dorset, from 15,880 to 19,016, which, it states, is an oversupply ‘significantly above’ the ‘objectively assessed need’.

Why do WDDC plan to build more houses than are needed?

The Local Plan Review plans to increase the Vearse Farm development from 760 to 930 houses (including over 4 hectares of business parks and other buildings). The expanded Vearse Farm development comes on top of a number of significant existing and planned developments?

Why is Bridport being overloaded with these developments?

The Local Plan Review admits that ‘the total projected need for affordable housing is not expected to be met in the plan review period. The need for affordable housing is far more important than providing yet more open market houses that many local people cannot afford.

Why is that over a 20 year period WDDC cannot deliver the affordable housing needs which it says is the greatest housing priority?

  1. BUILDING ON AREA OF OUTSTANDING NATURAL BEAUTY (AONB)

The Local Plan repeatedly says that one of its key objectives is to protect and enhance the AONB.

The Vearse Farm development (just outside Bridport, in the parish of Symondsbury) is a designated area of outstanding natural beauty (AONB).

This is largest development on AONB in the UK ever proposed!

How can building nearly a thousand houses and many hectares of associated buildings be considered to be “enhancing” or “protecting” the AONB?

The VF development also contravenes the National Planning Policy Framework (NPPF) as the outline planning permission does not state the ‘exceptional circumstances’ needed to support building on an AONB. The planning permission also fails (as required by law) to consider the scope for developing elsewhere outside the AONB or meeting the housing need some other way.

  1. NOT USING BROWNFIELD SITES

The Local Plan Review fails to make any provision for the investigation of the many alternative brownfield sites available in the area covered by the plan.  WDDC are required to keep a register of brownfield sites but make no use of it for the Local Plan when considering alternatives to large developments on AONB (eg  Vearse Farm).

Why does the Local Plan Review not consider available Brownfield sites – many of which are dotted around Bridport and in some cases the land is already owned by the Council?

Also alternative models of housing provision have not been investigated, such as eco housing (eg the proposed Watton eco Village (near Bradpole) providing over 250 affordable/shared ownership homes and only 44 open market houses).

Why is the Local Plan Review not truly strategic by including such models for genuinely low-cost housing for sale and rent and making much-needed social houses a priority in order to deal with the housing crisis being suffered by local people?

  1. TRAFFIC OVERLOAD

Bridport has very poor links to the rest of the world, both in terms of roads and also public transport. The roads and narrow footways barely cope with the needs of the existing population. The highway network in the town and its approaches suffers serious congestion much of the time.  Car parking is limited and often at full capacity. Maximising safe sustainable modes of transport, walking and cycling, is not a practical option.

Where in the Local Plan review are there proposals for substantial investment in Bridport’s road network and car parking facilities and ensuring that house building is in line with the character and capacity of the town?

WE HOPE YOU SHARE OUR CONCERNS ABOUT THE LIMITATIONS IN THE LOCAL PLAN REVIEW AND THE DETRIMENTAL IMPACT OF THE LARGE SCALE VEARSE FARM DEVELOPMENT ON BRIDPORT.

IT IS VITAL THAT THE PEOPLE OF BRIDPORT HAVE THEIR SAY BEFORE IT IS TOO LATE. PLEASE TAKE THE OPPORTUNITY TO RAISE YOUR CONCERNS AT THE ROAD SHOW OR ONLINE (LINK PROVIDED BELOW).

 

ADVEARSE TEAM

Advearse contact details:

advearse@aol.com

See and respond to Local Plan Review online:

https://www.dorsetforyou.gov.uk/planning-buildings-land/planning-policy/west-dorset-and-weymouth-portland/local-plan-review/local-plan-review-west-dorset-weymouth-portland.aspx

 

Campaign Site